Without votes to eliminate PASO, the Government begins to consider suspension

He government faces a significant challenge by not being able to gather the votes necessary to eliminate the Simultaneous and Mandatory Open Primaries (PASO). Given this situation, the suspension of the PASO has begun to be considered as a viable alternative.

The opposition blocs have lined up against the elimination of the PASO that the Government and they seek to impose the debate of their projects to interrupt the Primaries this year. The elections, implemented in 2009, aim to democratize the candidate selection process and allow greater citizen participation in the elections.

However, in recent years, criticism has arisen about its effectiveness and cost. Some sectors argue that PASOs have lost their original purpose and have become a financial burden for the State.

The government, failing to obtain the necessary votes to eliminate PASO, has begun to explore the possibility of temporarily suspending them. This measure would allow us to gain time to debate and analyze alternatives that can improve the electoral system without completely eliminating the PASO.

Without votes to eliminate PASO, the Government begins to consider suspension

The suspension of the PASSED It could also be seen as a way to avoid a direct confrontation with the opposition, which has shown strong resistance to the elimination of the Primaries. The opposition blocs, for their part, have presented projects to interrupt the PASO this year.

These projects seek to modify the electoral calendar and propose alternatives that allow greater citizen participation without the associated costs. The opposition argues that PASOs are an important tool for democracy and that their elimination or suspension could weaken the electoral system.

Without votes to eliminate PASO, the Government begins to consider suspension

Context

In this context, the debate on Simultaneas has intensified in the political and media sphere. Advocates maintain that these primaries are essential to ensure transparency and citizen participation in the electoral process.

They argue that they allow citizens to elect candidates directly and democratically, which strengthens the legitimacy of elected candidates. On the other hand, critics of the PASSED They point out that these primaries have lost their original purpose and have become a financial burden for the State.

Source link