Today: December 22, 2024
December 9, 2024
1 min read

Castillo Saviñón challenges elections of the PLD Political Committee

Castillo Saviñón impugna elecciones del Comité Político PLD

Santo Domingo.-A leader of the Dominican Liberation Party (PLD) presented a challenge against the decisions of the congress that held that political organization after not being elected before that body of internal decisions of the political organization.

He Superior Electoral Court postponed to Thursday, January 2, 2025, the hearing on the action called “Remedy to challenge specific party actions: against the final allocation of seats of the Political Committee (PC) of the Dominican Liberation Party (PLD).

The lawsuit was filed by José Manuel del Castillo Saviñón, member of the Central Committee of the PLD, against the Dominican Liberation Party (PLD) and the final seat assignment of the Political Committee (CP) of said party organization made by the Organizing Commission of the X Ordinary Congress, Reinaldo Pared Pérez (COXCO), held on October 27, 2024.

It was reported that the election of the PLD Political Committee is a responsibility of the members of its Central Committee.

In his action, the challenger argues that the Organizing Commission of the 10th Congress of the PLD made an erroneous interpretation of the articles of the aforementioned party that determine the composition of its Political Committee.

Read: PLD will be a low-cost party and will tour the country

He activator argues violation of the right to elect and be elected of members of the Central Committee participants in the election, requesting a new assignment in accordance with the Constitution of the RepublicLaw no. 33-18 Parties, Movements and Political Groups, as well as the PLD Statutes.

The TSE, made up of the presiding judge, Ygnacio Pascual Camacho Hidalgo; Hermenegilda del Rosario Fondeur Ramírez; Rosa Pérez de García; Pedro P. Yermenos Forastieri and Fernando Fernández Cruz, main judges, ordered the postponement for reciprocal communication of the documents that the parties intend to assert in the process.

The postponement request of the hearing was requested by the legal representation of the plaintiff, to which the party’s lawyer did not oppose contested. Both parties were duly citedthrough their representatives, for the next hearing.



Source link

Latest Posts

They celebrated "Buenos Aires Coffee Day" with a tour of historic bars - Télam
Cum at clita latine. Tation nominavi quo id. An est possit adipiscing, error tation qualisque vel te.

Categories

“We are desperate”: relatives of Carlos Valecillo demand proof of life
Previous Story

“We are desperate”: relatives of Carlos Valecillo demand proof of life

Administradoras de Fondos de Pensiones
Next Story

Pension funds in October 2024: annual gains exceed 9%

Latest from Blog

GNB seizes more than 8 kilos of drugs

GNB seizes more than 8 kilos of drugs

Members of the Bolivarian National Guard seized 8,250 kilos of marijuana in the state of Táchira from Colombia. The seizure occurred while they were carrying out the control and verification tasks of
Go toTop