The magistrates resolved 475 matters as a package (138 general matters and 337 citizen trials) and with their rulings favorable to the process, the TEPJF left the judicial electoral process intact, at least until the appointment phase of the Evaluation Committees of the three Branches.
Until now the Court had ruled only on the suspensions issued by judges on the electoral reform and with the endorsement of three judges in favor and two against it had considered that the election should not be suspended, despite the court orders.
In the night session this Friday, the TEPJF resolved the first citizen lawsuits against the call issued by the Senate for not addressing the suspensions of the application of the judicial reform dictated by judges; ordered for not offering guarantees of parity, or for not having included judges who lack definitive assignment.
In addition, appeals were resolved against the raffle in which it was decided which positions would be elected in 2025 and which in 2027, due to procedural failures and for not strictly complying with the insaculations as established in the Constitution.
Challenges were also analyzed against the presence of people linked to the Labor Party (PT) and Morena in the Evaluation Committee of the Legislative Power; against the calls issued by the Committees for not including parity criteria or affirmative actions for LGTBIQ+ people or for young people, and against the rules and times that were given to the judges to resign and decline to participate in the election.
All the allegations were dismissed by judges Mónica Soto, president, Felipe Fuentes Barrera and Felipe de la Mata Pizaña, who decided not to give arguments during the session and validated all the stages and decisions taken by the Senate and the Executive, Legislative and Judicial powers. when integrating their Committees.
The only thing they accepted was to give the Senate a view to rule on the judges who do not have a definitive assignment and when they will be renewed.
This was also supported by judges Reyes Rodríguez Mondragón and Janine Otálora Malassis, who, on the other hand, voted against the rest of the projects and with various arguments spoke out in favor of revoking the call issued by the Senate.
