The judges of the First Collegiate Court of the National District set for next Monday, October 28, at 10:00 in the morning, the final ruling in it new judgment of background against Argenis Contreras and other defendants for kidnapping and murder of the lawyer and university professor Yuniol Ramirez.
In the case, which is heard in the Ciudad Nueva Courthouse, judges Esmirna Gisselle Méndez, Tania Yunes and Jissel Naranjo, retired to deliberate until the aforementioned date.
On the one hand, the defendants who received sentences damning they ask absolution; while the Public Ministry requests 30 years in prison for Contreras.
Argenis Contreras faces a new judgment of backgroundafter the Court of Appeal of the National District, at the request of the Public Ministry, will order the opening.
In addition to him, for him crime are pointed out Víctor Ravelo Campos and José Mercado Blanco, who were sentenced to acquittal in September 2022. For them, in this new stage, the prosecution body asks for 20 years. They pleaded not guilty through tears on the stand.
For the accused Lilian Suárez Jáquez, who was acquitted On the same date, the prosecutors They request five years in prison. She cried when she declared that she knows nothing about the case and that she is innocent.
In its presentations, the Public Ministry revived the scene in which he was found dead Yuniol Ramírez, in a stream in the community of Manoguayabo in Santo Domingo Oeste, on October 12, 2017seven years ago now.
The process until new judgment
In last februarythe Criminal Chamber of the Court of Appeal of the National District annulled the decision issued in September 2022 by the Second Collegiate Court of the National District and imposed two years in prison for corruption against Manuel Rivas, former director of the Metropolitan Office of Bus Services (WHOSA).
Consequently, ordered a new trial against Argenis ContrerasLilian Francisca Suárez, Víctor Ravelo Campos and José Mercado, accused of the kidnapping and murder of Yuniol Ramirez.
The Public Ministry points to Argenis Contreras like him main material author of the crimeand links it with acts of corruption administrative in the WHOSA during the administration of Manuel Rivas between 2012 and 2016. After the murder of the university professor, Contreras fled the country and was extradited from the United States in February of 2021.
They ask to be liberated
The defense of Argenis Contreras and the other defendants they ask that your clients are acquitted.
Furthermore, they ask the reason why businessman Eddy Santana Zorilla was released by the sixth court of Instruction of the municipality of Santo Domingo Oeste in 2018.
Santana Zorrilla was accused of allegedly committing acts of corruption in WHOSAleaving as an outcome the murder of lawyer Yuniol Ramirez.
In his presentations, Contreras mentions Colonel Faustino Rosario, financial manager of Omsa, accused of corruption. He says that this was part of the mapping or calls established by the Public Ministry, on the day of the incident.
He lawyer Plutarch Jáquez, representative of Argenis Contreras establishes that none of the evidence presented by the Public Ministry is binding.
“Argenis established that the van in which he was transferred to Manoguayabo Yuniol Ramírez lent it to some police“Jáquez said.
Consider that the factual plan presented by the Public Ministry indicates that everything was a homicide, but never a murder.
For him lawyer There are aspects, such as report of necropsy that don’t fit.
“The Public Ministry says that Argenis killed Yuniol of a shot from the seat of the driver and that the latter was in the driver’s seat. However, the report of necropsy says that Yuniol I had the shot on the right side of my head,” he says.
He questioned that Eddy Santana Zorilla, being the person who delivered a million of weights to Yuniol Ramírez at a fuel pump, is not sitting on the bench, even though he appears in the file.
He states that for this reason, Ramón Ramírez, brother of Yuniolwithdraws from the process.
“There is many things that don’t fit. We ask for absolution in that case,” stressed Jáquez, lawyer of Contreras.