The Parents’ Union and the Teachers’ Alliance reported that since the SEP published the call, it was possible to observe that the participation of those who make up the educational community was limited to Facebook or YouTube.
Even so, they mentioned, teachers, parents and interested parties connected to express their disagreements and even requested that participation in these assemblies be opened, and in a “strange” way they stopped broadcasting.
As for the content, they charged that the proposals made in these assemblies, and of which the SEP took note, are mainly characterized by being “ideologized and anti-academic.”
They also pointed out that the proposal instrumentalizes education; it limits the teaching work; it reintroduces the notion of training fields, thereby eliminating specific subjects and reducing the possibility of being evaluated; eliminates summative evaluation, limiting it to diagnostic and formative; sees reading as a means to ends mainly of a social and cultural nature, but not very academic. and limit educational methodologies to project-based learning, constructivism and active school.
