The recent lifting of the legal muzzle that prohibited naming Jorge Lanata It has generated a great stir in the media and in Argentine public opinion. This measure, initially imposed by Judge Lucila Córdoba, was reversed after a forceful response from Lanata himself, who is admitted to a neurorehabilitation clinic.
The legal muzzle was imposed by Judge Lucila Córdoba, in charge of the Civil Court No. 8 of Buenos Aires, with the aim of protecting the privacy of Jorge Lanata and his wife, the lawyer Elba Marcovecchio.
This measure prohibited the media from mentioning Lanata’s name and providing information about her state of health and her family circle.. The decision generated a wave of criticism, especially in the journalistic field, where it was considered an attack on freedom of expression.
The situation took an unexpected turn when Judge Córdoba decided to consult the journalist about his wishes regarding the imposed measure. The journalist’s response was clear and direct: “One can always go out and respond.”
With this statement, Lanata made it clear that he did not want information about him to be limited, arguing that he would always have the opportunity to respond to any information that was published about him.
This response was decisive for the judge to reverse her decision. The judge considered that, given the express consent of Jorgethere was no justification for keeping the muzzle legal. Thus, on September 29, the ban was lifted, once again allowing the media to mention the journalist and provide information about his state of health.
Reactions
The lifting of the legal muzzle was met with relief and satisfaction by the media. Journalists and press freedom organizations celebrated the decision, considering it a victory for freedom of expression.
The Association of Argentine Journalists (APA) issued a statement in which it highlighted the importance of this resolution to guarantee the right to information and transparency in media coverage. On the other hand, public opinion also showed great interest in the case. Social networks were filled with comments and debates about the measure and its subsequent lifting.
follow us on Google News and on our channel instagramto continue enjoying the latest news and our best content.
