The Attorney General of the Republic, Miriam German Brito said that he was characterized by allowing each public prosecutor to act within the scope of his jurisdiction, although he admitted that he had differences with some, in clashes that finally ended with agreements “regarding some” of these differences, and “not reaching” conciliation “regarding others.”
The Attorney Generalwho will put his position at the disposal of President Abinader on August 16, stated that he understands that the vision he has of the way to conduct his management It is not shared by many, but what could not be allowed was “to give in to the pressure of sectors that understand that justice is a game of individual interests and not a sacred vocation.”
“It is not true to say that I did not have serious differences with my peers on many occasions, reaching consensus on some and not reaching agreements on others,” he said.
He added that he respected the wise authority of each prosecutor in his field, only intervening “when it was necessary to define clear guidelines to guarantee the protection of the rights of populations at greater risk of vulnerability, or to unify criteria in the criminal prosecution of certain crimes.”
Transparency was the most difficult thing
Miriam German Brito admitted that due to “deep-rooted behaviors,” transparency “was more difficult than he expected” in his management four years as the highest representative of the Public ministry.
In the presentation of his memoirs, corresponding to the four years of his managementGermán Brito said that she concluded it satisfied.
The former judge of the Supreme Court of Justice also presented her accountability in a crowded event at the Continental Hotel, attended by legislators, members of the judiciary and other representatives of the Public ministry.
