May 26, 2023, 20:10 PM
May 26, 2023, 20:10 PM
The same interpellants and the same number of questions They contemplate the interpellatory documents presented by eight parliamentarians from the Citizen Community (CC) bench. In January of this year, they called the Ministers of Government, Carlos Eduardo Del Castillo, and Justice, Iván Lima, to answer for the apprehension of the Governor of Santa Cruz, Luis Fernando Camacho. The Assembly session was convened for Tuesday at 2:30 p.m..
The call was published this Friday and the only item on the agenda will be the appearance of the Minister of Justice for that apprehension on December 28 of last year. Senators Fernando Vaca, Nelly Gallo, Andrea Barrientos, Corina Ferreira, Cecilia Moyoviri, Wálter Justiniano, Rodrigo Paz and Cecilia Requena are the eight legislators who signed the document.
The first question is about the actions of that ministry to translate the recommendations of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on the justice reforms, judicial independence and due process.
The second question also refers to the OHCHR report regarding pretrial detention as a last resort court to be applied against people.
The third asks to know what the Ministry of Justice did to guarantee people a due process, impartiality and the natural judgewhich does not apply against opponents of the Government.
The fourth returns to the recommendations of the High Commissioner to find out why the criminal figure of “crimes against state security”.
The fifth question asks for an explanation about the recommendations of the GIEI regarding the lack of independence in the administration of justice; the instrumentalization of justice; and the use and abuse of preventive detention.
The sixth refers to a 2018 advocacy report in which he asks the Government to defend individual rights, the presumption of innocence and the high costs of preventive detention.
With this background, the seventh question asks to know What did the Ministry of Justice do? regarding the lack of proportionality in the exercise of force, including the lack of an arrest warrant against the governor Camacho at the time of his apprehension.
In question 8, they ask to know the actions that office is taking regarding a detention in full legal vacation.
In the ninth question, they ask to know what was done about the disappearance of the sentence, 0012/2021 that it declared articles 90, 91 and 344 of the current Penal Code unconstitutional; and calls for an investigation into that embarrassing role of the TCP.
The last two questions also refer to the work carried out by that ministry in the application of judgment 0012/2021in addition to sentences subsequent to that and that took the document that disappeared as a reference.
While on Monday, one day before the interpellation, the vice president, David Choquehuanca, summoned the heads of bench of all the parties to a meeting with the aim of putting an end to the unfortunate shows that the legislators are giving in the last questions.
