With the recusal the process opened around the file is lengthened, it is a move qualified by the complaint as a delaying maneuver that points to an extinction due to expiration of the procedural term.
The procedure presented by lawyers for the representative of the UCA was presented against Victor Ríos and Guido Samudio, considering that they expressed their opinion regarding the file, for which reason they lost the objectivity that is necessary to define their respective rulings.
It may interest you: Prosecutor’s Office investigates the shooting murder of a merchant in Karapa‘Yo
The case was in a section in which entry into a definition process was imminent. However, with the recusal, considered by the complaint as a mere Chicana, pushes again towards an instance of uncertainty.
The episode that led to the scandal has taken on highly conflictive edges, to the point that Cardinal Adalberto Martinez himself affirmed his opinion that Kriskovich should be removed from his position as a member of the University Council of the Catholic University of Asunción.
The entrance Complaint of harassment, from Belén against Kriskovich: they accuse a Chicana member of the UCA was first published on newspaper TODAY.
