In his defense, the judge Rafael Alcon He said that on two occasions he told investigators to notify the parties of the femicide of the death of Blanca Rubí Limachi Sirpa in 2013, but they were not present. Also, he declared to be a person of the third age and must be considered.
“The incident raised by Mr. Richard Choque Flores it was brought to the attention of the Public Ministry and the victim,” points out the sixth answer that the judge gave to the investigators this Friday afternoon when the investigator asked him if the incident raised by the serial killer was known to the victim.
In question 16, the researcher asked again about the notice to the parties and asked if he had verified that notice. “I myself personally verified the notifications to all parties,” Hawk said again.
At the end of 2019, Judge Rafael Alcón issued resolution 890/2019 by which Richard Choque Flores was placed under house arrest for 18 months, despite having an enforceable sentence of 30 years without the right to pardon for the femicide of Blanca Rubí Limachi Sirpa, committed in 2013. The murderer was released and five days ago it was learned that he had murdered two other girls and said he was the author of the disappearance of 77 other victims.
Now the judge faces a judicial process for malfeasance and was apprehended, the accusation of the Prosecutor’s Office requires a prison term of six months while the investigation lasts. The now accused judge said he was old enough to be considered in the elderly group.
“We are going to attach and certify the documentation that shows that I have a family, work, address and my state of health. Also I clearly establish that due to my age I am within the regulations of the elderly, I am assuming defense”, indicates the last answer of Judge Alcón.
Despite these statements, the attorney for the minor Blanca Rubí Limachi SirpaJhon Tapia, stated that he was the lawyer for the entire process and assured that he was never notified with that audience and challenged the judge to present proof that the plaintiff was indeed notified.
I have had my office in the same place for many years, I changed recently, How did we not find out about that audience? questioned the professional and said that one of the two parties, the Prosecutor’s Office or the plaintiffs, could have been aware of that hearing, but it was not.
Alcon, in his statement, He said he did not know if the parties presented any objection, because the notebook was returned to the city of El Alto, where the case corresponded. He did not explain why he held the hearing without the presence of the parties.
Lawyer Tapia explained that the judge could not hold a hearing of such interest without the presence of the victim’s family.
In his defense, the judge Rafael Alcon He said that on two occasions he told investigators to notify the parties of the femicide of the death of Blanca Rubí Limachi Sirpa in 2013, but they were not present. Also, he declared to be a person of the third age and must be considered.
“The incident raised by Mr. Richard Choque Flores it was brought to the attention of the Public Ministry and the victim,” points out the sixth answer that the judge gave to the investigators this Friday afternoon when the investigator asked him if the incident raised by the serial killer was known to the victim.
In question 16, the researcher asked again about the notice to the parties and asked if he had verified that notice. “I myself personally verified the notifications to all parties,” Hawk said again.
At the end of 2019, Judge Rafael Alcón issued resolution 890/2019 by which Richard Choque Flores was placed under house arrest for 18 months, despite having an enforceable sentence of 30 years without the right to pardon for the femicide of Blanca Rubí Limachi Sirpa, committed in 2013. The murderer was released and five days ago it was learned that he had murdered two other girls and said he was the author of the disappearance of 77 other victims.
Now the judge faces a judicial process for malfeasance and was apprehended, the accusation of the Prosecutor’s Office requires a prison term of six months while the investigation lasts. The now accused judge said he was old enough to be considered in the elderly group.
“We are going to attach and certify the documentation that shows that I have a family, work, address and my state of health. Also I clearly establish that due to my age I am within the regulations of the elderly, I am assuming defense”, indicates the last answer of Judge Alcón.
Despite these statements, the attorney for the minor Blanca Rubí Limachi SirpaJhon Tapia, stated that he was the lawyer for the entire process and assured that he was never notified with that audience and challenged the judge to present proof that the plaintiff was indeed notified.
I have had my office in the same place for many years, I changed recently, How did we not find out about that audience? questioned the professional and said that one of the two parties, the Prosecutor’s Office or the plaintiffs, could have been aware of that hearing, but it was not.
Alcon, in his statement, He said he did not know if the parties presented any objection, because the notebook was returned to the city of El Alto, where the case corresponded. He did not explain why he held the hearing without the presence of the parties.
Lawyer Tapia explained that the judge could not hold a hearing of such interest without the presence of the victim’s family.
;
