Today: September 23, 2024
December 10, 2022
4 mins read

Tension in the debate on the book ‘Cuban Privilege’, but the blood did not reach the river

Tension in the debate on the book 'Cuban Privilege', but the blood did not reach the river

the controversial book Cuban Privilegee (Cambridge University Press, 2022) –on US immigration policies towards Cuba– by the American academic susan eckstein, was presented this Friday at Florida International University (FIU). The event had the reply of the author and journalist Orlando Gutiérrez-Boronat and the moderation of Jorge Duany, director of the Cuban Research Institute of the FIU.

The event, Duany said, “has attracted considerable interest from the community and the media.” The professor considered it necessary to clarify the role of the FIU in organizing events of this type, which consists of “dissemination of knowledge about Cuba and its diaspora”, in addition to creating a “space for the open discussion of ideas in a safe and respectful”.

As the author of a Cuban-themed book, the FIU considered that Eckstein –despite the fact that her criteria could be “controversial”– was capable of motivating a debate on a controversial aspect of Cuban reality.

He also pointed out that, in the past, the FIU has invited numerous dissidents and organizations opposed to the Cuban government. However, he clarified, in none of the cases, the opinions of the speakers should be considered as official points of view of the institution or its faculty.

He added that the institution expected the audience to behave with “decency” and ensure “civilized discussion.”

One of the most controversial ideas mentioned by Eckstein was the questioning of the status of “refugees in the US” of Cuban migrants.

Professor Susan Eckstein had twenty minutes to present the main ideas of her book. He warned that “I had studied the Cuban issue for quite some time,” as well as migratory movements from the Island to the US. “My text is completely focused on US policies,” he assured, although that also implies explaining the causes and consequences of these policies and, of course, define Cuban-American influence in Miami.

Eckstein concentrated on providing data on the measures implemented by different US presidents –although regulated by Congress– starting in 1959 and describing their effect on the growing Cuban immigration in his country.

One of the most controversial ideas mentioned by Eckstein was the questioning of the status of “refugees in the US” of Cuban migrants. According to the academic, the US government doubted, at least since 1980 -with the Administration of President Jimmy Carter-, that Cubans could fit into a legal situation of political asylum.

This leads, Eckstein suggests, to a systematic review of migration policies and the benefits received by Cubans, which, as his book states, other migrants have not enjoyed. Those benefits were “an instrument of US foreign policy during the Cold War,” she concluded.

As of today, Ecksein calculated, “there are at least ten Cuban-Americans in Congress,” for which the community should be “proud,” he said, to a standing ovation from the audience.

However, she regretted, while Cubans can quickly request asylum, other Latin American migrants cannot claim this reason to reside permanently in the US Due to time constraints, the academic was unable to finish her argument.

The writer and journalist Orlando Gutiérrez-Boronat, in charge of the academic counterpoint with Eckstein, indicated that he came to defend “the truth of the Cuban struggle.” He was pleased that the professor was willing to discuss his premises and receive criticism, and announced that he would comment on what, in his opinion, is the essential postulate of the book: “Cubans have been considered as refugees despite the fact that what is at risk It’s not your life, it’s your lifestyle.”

Gutiérrez-Boronat assured that the book was written from an “ideological prejudice” of the author. This bias jeopardizes the credibility of Eckstein’s arguments, she opined.

The Cuban listed the misconceptions on which Eckstein bases his arguments, such as the idea that the Cuban regime is based on “altruistic values” or that it is not a totalitarian government. He pointed out the omissions, in the text, of the Military Production Support Units (Umap), the surveillance of State Security, the torture and executions, and many other examples of repression.

“These are not ‘low moments’ of the revolution, as the professor affirms, but rather they were there from the beginning,” says Gutiérrez-Boronat. Finally, she criticized the accusation of drug trafficking attributed by Eckstein to the Cuban American National Foundation (CANF) and described it as “serious.”

“We continue dreaming of a free Cuba,” said Gutiérrez-Boronat, to which the audience reacted with great applause.

“We continue dreaming of a free Cuba,” said Gutiérrez-Boronat, to which the audience reacted with great applause. At the end of the interventions, Professor Duany announced that it was time for the public to present his questions.

The president of the Bay of Pigs Veterans Association, Rafael Montalvo, congratulated the Cuban community attending the presentation for respecting the nature of the debate. “That’s how it’s done,” he affirmed, while slogans of “Down with communism!”, “Homeland and Life!” and “Cuba libre!”, which were repeated with greater emphasis at the end of the event.

The journalist Ninoska Pérez accused Eckstein, during her speech, of “being distracted by defending the communist regime in Cuba.” “For you, Raúl Castro, Che Guevara and Fidel Castro are still heroes, and that is insulting,” she said.

Eckstein defended himself against some of the public comments, saying they were “offensive and off-topic.” “This is supposed to be a book launch,” he lamented. “I am also the daughter of refugees,” said the teacher, “I understand the pain they have gone through.”

Some attendees congratulated Eckstein and Gutiérrez-Boronat for holding the event despite extensive criticism and pressure from various activists in Miami. The conversation, which was to be held at the Books & Books bookstore in Coral Gables, had to be moved to the FIU facilities. At that very moment, in the vicinity of the university, a group of Cuban-Americans carried out a protest –convened weeks ago– against the presentation of Cuban Privilege.

________________________

Collaborate with our work:

The team of 14ymedio He is committed to doing serious journalism that reflects the reality of deep Cuba. Thank you for accompanying us on this long road. We invite you to continue supporting us, but this time becoming a member of our newspaper. Together we can continue transforming journalism in Cuba.



Source link

Latest Posts

They celebrated "Buenos Aires Coffee Day" with a tour of historic bars - Télam
Cum at clita latine. Tation nominavi quo id. An est possit adipiscing, error tation qualisque vel te.

Categories

Lo de Julio, a space for conversation
Previous Story

Lo de Julio, a space for conversation

Reineris Andreu es el sexto luchador que este año abandona Cuba
Next Story

Reineris Andreu is the sixth wrestler to leave Cuba this year

Latest from Blog

Jorge Durand: Which is worse: red or blue?

Beyond the anti-immigrant rhetoric, during election and campaign times, the historical truth is that the Republican and Democratic parties are more or less on par with their immigration policies and how they
Inabie distribuye cinco millones de raciones diarias

Inabie distributes five million daily rations

In school feeding, Inabie has spent RD$23.3 billion this year from a budget of RD$26.068 billion, which represents an execution of 88% The National Institute for Student Welfare (Inabie) distributes more than
Go toTop