The vice president’s complaint Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner demanded through a new judicial presentation that it be investigated if there were meetings prior to the attack against her between the people who wanted to assassinate her and the leader of the New Center Right Hernán Carrol.
The lawyers José Manuel Ubeira and Marcos Aldazabal They included the requirement in the brief, which they presented to Judge María Eugenia Capuchetti, and based it on an analysis of the geographical impacts of cell phone antennas already incorporated into the case and prepared by Dajudeco, an office of the Judiciary that assists in investigations. of complex crimes.
Carrol is the right-wing leader whom the detainee Fernando Sabag Montielthe man who wanted to kill the Vice President, assigned her in a letter from prison and forwarded to federal court 5 the mission of appointing a defense attorney for her.
The leader of the New Center Right (NCD) knew Sabag Montiel and the detainee Brenda Uliartean accomplice of Sabag Montiel, because he had made contact with her after she became known for speaking on television against people who receive social plans.
Carrol testified as a witness in court, she said that she had done an interview with Uliarte on Instagram and that later she was invited with her partner to the birthday of Martín Almeida, another member of the NCD.
The complaint highlighted in its presentation that “on four different days there were coincidences of close coverage of antennas between the telephones of Hernán Carrol, Brenda Uliarte, Martín Uliarte (Brenda’s cousin) and Fernando Sabag Montiel.”
The report also “shows how, on August 4, Carrol’s cell phone received a communication that impacted the antenna of Ángel Pache, declared address of Gabriel Carrizo”, also arrested and investigated for the attack on the Vice President, according to what appears of the court brief.
“One of the days is August 20, the date in Carrol, Sabag Montiel and Brenda were together on Martín Grosso Almeida’s birthday, so that coincidence is explained”reconstructed the complaint, to later refer to the other coincidences.
“However, it is of the utmost importance to determine why the DaJudeco study also shows matches on August 1, 16 and 22. This report deserves to be carefully studied. The contacts between suspects that it indicates are varied and profuse,” the investigators said. lawyers in writing.
“If Carrol had been with Uliarte, his cousin and Sabag Montiel outside of Martín Almeida’s birthday, his statement would be even less credible,” they continued.
The lawyers also requested that the information disseminated by the Internet portal “El Cohete a la luna” be investigated, where on Sunday, October 13, the journalist Horacio Verbitsky announced that Brenda Uliarte would have been in a march of the Nuevo Centro Derecha group, of which Carrol is a part.
“Verbitsky had already given that information, and the group’s lawyer had replied that it was another person. However, Verbitsky found a photo that shows this supposed other person and what would be Brenda Uliarte. The clarification of the lawyer was evidently false, so it is important to know if the person pointed out by Verbitsky is, indeed, Brenda Uliarte,” the lawyers for the lawsuit highlighted.
And they concluded: “If that were the case, their relationship with Nuevo Centro Derecha would be completely different from what Carrol and Almeida stated in their statements.”
