Negative. Benji Espinoza, attorney for First Lady Lilia Paredes, He assured that his sponsored will not deliver his passport. This, minutes before starting the hearing of impediment to leave the country for 36 months against him, which, finally, was rescheduled for Wednesday, October 12.
In statements to the press, the lawyer mentioned that on that date it would be shown that Lilia Paredes he did not violate any rule of conduct so that justice prevents him from leaving Peruso it will not accept the request of the Public Ministry.
“The first lady is not going to hand over her passport. If I — reviewing the requirement — had seen that the Prosecutor’s Office’s requirement to prevent exit met all the requirements of the law, I would not have had any problem telling my client that it is a legal requirement,” Espinoza said.
According to the lawyer, the same Lilia Paredes has been attending both court hearings as well as the summonses in Congress, for which he would have “an irreproachable procedural conduct and that is an element to consider in measures of this type.”
at another time, benji espinoza referred to the suspensions given by Judge Raúl Justiniano Romeroof the Eighth Preparatory Investigation Court, to evaluate the measure against the wife of peter castle.
“The first time it was suspended because the Prosecutor requested it, the second time it was suspended because the judge had to resolve the resource of another defense, the third time it was suspended because I had a ticket two years ago and there was no malicious act. Malicious is that you summon me to a hearing and I buy a ticket so that he gets frustrated, ”she limited.
Lilia Paredes could receive between 8 and 10 years in prison, according to the Prosecutor’s Office
For his part, the prosecutor Jorge Garciaa member of the Special Team against the Corruption of Power, argued that Lilia Paredes could receive between 8 and 10 years of imprisonment for the alleged crime of criminal organization.
During the departure bar hearing, the representative of the Public ministry argued that, despite the fact that Paredes Navarro had attended all the subpoenas, this could change before a possible penalty, which would be reflected in the evasion of justice.
