The Ombudsman warned this Friday that if it is proven that the ethnocacerist Antauro Humala did not carry out activities to qualify for penitentiary benefits, the National Penitentiary Institute (INPE) must evaluate the annulment of the resolution that ordered his release.
In a statement, he asked said institution to initiate a “depth investigation” to determine alleged irregularities that occurred in the granting of freedom to Humala Taso, after it was revealed that the arguments disseminated by said body, referring to the fact that he had carried out manual labor, were false.
The request was made through a document addressed to the president of the INPE National Penitentiary Council, Omar Méndez, in which the seriousness of the statements is noted offered last Thursday by the ex-military to a media outlet.
LOOK: Where can you get a cancer screening and how much does it cost
In said interview, the ethnocacerist reported that never carried out any activity related to work or education during his period of imprisonment in different prisons, thus denying the versions offered to Parliament by the head of INPE.
Indeed, during his presentation before the Justice Commission of Congress, Méndez specified that Humala Tasso developed various tasks that included projects with a well-known animated child figure, as well as other manual work.
However, in the interview, the retired Army major denies these versions, pointing out that he only dedicated himself to the publication of his books, hinting at an alleged adulteration of the bills that would have served as support for the granting of freedom.
“This situation is worrisome, since from the revision of the file of penitentiary benefit of sentence served with redemption for work and study, it is noted that there are two education and work plans that certify the activities carried out by Mr. Humala. However, in the aforementioned interview he categorically affirms that he has never done craft work, painting, among others”says the document signed by the head of the Criminal and Penitentiary Affairs Program of the Ombudsman’s Office, Carlos Fernández.
In the document, Fernandez requested that the investigation initiated by INPE make it possible to clarify the facts denounced, in order to identify and punish people who would have acted irregularly while free that was granted to Humala on August 17, without prejudice to the criminal actions that the prosecution could initiate.
“In addition, he specified that, if it is confirmed that the former Humala did not carry out work or studies effectively, as he himself indicated in the interview, it would be up to INPE to evaluate the ex officio declaration of nullity of the directorial resolution through which his freedom was ordered, under the provisions of the Single Ordered Text of the Law of General Administrative Procedure, Law No. 27444″sentenced.
