Today: September 30, 2024
September 5, 2022
1 min read

ENM summons legal researchers to submit unpublished articles on Chávez’s thought

ENM llama a investigadores jurídicos a enviar artículos inéditos sobre pensamiento de Chávez

The National School of the Judiciary (ENM) of Venezuela invited legal researchers to send unpublished and original articles to write the monographic issue dedicated to the thought of the leader of the Bolivarian Revolution, Hugo Chávez.

According to a review by the Venezuelan News Agency (AVN), the call for Hugo Chávez’s legal thought proposes the submission of articles on the Law and Constitution of 1999, laws passed during the presidential period of Commander Hugo Chávez, such as the Land Law, Agrarian Development and others.

Similarly, anti-imperialist thought: ALBA, UNASUR, Petrocaribe, CELAC and Telesur; Social State and Social Missions; protection of women, courts of violence against women and the Organic Law on the Right of Women to a Life Free of Violence.

Also, on Legal Architecture of the Judiciary, Legal Architecture of the Communal System.

The articles must be sent until October 7to the email [email protected] or contact by telephone number 0414-2172138.

VTV/FB/DNA



Source link

Latest Posts

They celebrated "Buenos Aires Coffee Day" with a tour of historic bars - Télam
Cum at clita latine. Tation nominavi quo id. An est possit adipiscing, error tation qualisque vel te.

Categories

Axel Kicillof asked to reflect on hate speech and behavior
Previous Story

Axel Kicillof asked to reflect on hate speech and behavior

The municipality will contribute 50% of the cost of the amplification for the presentation of the Spring Festival
Next Story

The municipality will contribute 50% of the cost of the amplification for the presentation of the Spring Festival

Latest from Blog

Acusa Visa prácticas monopólicas

Visa accuses monopolistic practices

Justice Department Complaint Alleges Visa Imposed Anticompetitive Pricing Structure The U.S. Department of Justice sued Visa Inc. for illegally monopolizing the debit card market in the Biden administration’s first major antitrust case
Go toTop