Whether with the successful morning program “I have other data” or “I lie as a breather”, in which more than certainties and solutions, complaints and excuses are offered; or for the talk show favorite of the so-called 4T, Jaguar Tuesday. Now, the so-called 4T offers us a typical scapegoat in the case of the Ayotzinapa normalistas.
It turns out that for the government and its prosecution, oh no, sorry! is autonomous, the main person responsible for the tragic disappearance of the 43 students is the man who, in the past administration, assumed the responsibility of finding them and clarifying the facts.
At a minimum, it is somewhat questionable, even more so when the new report “has not been able to throw out the historical truth,” as Murillo Karam himself pointed out on Wednesday at his hearing before the judge.
In addition, the 4T call freed the real culprits. And how can we forget that the Abarcas were candidates thanks to ‘you know who’.
Of course, this selective justice should not surprise us.
And it is not the first time that the investigation folders of the so-called 4T are weak, nor that the prosecution wants to give a pig in a poke.
He has done it with other characters from the past government whom he has accused without sufficient evidence. Now, in the Murillo Karam case, it is complicated that the crimes of “forced disappearance”, “torture” and “against the administration of justice” can be proven, so that, more than justice, it seems a justification to justify the lack of justice. a new version of the facts.
double edged razor
The only thing to tell the 4T is to be careful, because this media montage may end up being one more burden of the many that this government accumulates. And if it doesn’t turn out the way they want (everything points to that and I refer to the evidence), it can end in absurd unsupported accusations.
The government is a victim of its own labyrinth and now, without clear evidence, it intends to imprison an older man. All at a time, moreover, when preventive detention is being strongly questioned and has even been defined as a violation of the presumption of innocence and human rights.
We have already seen them in the case of Rosario Robles, where after three years it was shown that her detention was arbitrary and violated due process.
If that happens with such prominent figures, what awaits the rest of the Mexicans? Everything seems that, for the transformation, we are all guilty until a judge says otherwise. And the word of a confessed criminal is worth more than that of a citizen with rights.
