A violent march defended Cristina Fernández. It was held on Saturday and ended with excesses. The mobilization was a response to the accusation that weighs on the current and former vice president of Argentina. A prosecutor assures that she knew “the greatest work of corruption” in the history of that country, with an economic damage of one billion dollars. He argues on the basis of a plot of bidding for works, some overpriced and others not completed, but which privileged a businessman, who happened to be an ally of Kirchnerism.
The defendant, very much in her style, went out shouting from the rooftops that it is a political trial, and went further, saying that Peronism is being accused, as if the crimes were collective. The Argentine president seconded it and a statement was sent that caused controversy. He compared Diego Luciani, the prosecutor who accuses Cristina, with another prosecutor (Nisman) who also dared to indict her and who was found dead in her apartment, presumably by suicide.
The current political tsunami (of marches and speeches) aims to displace the arguments. She, the explosive lady, should use her energies in showing that she is honest, rather than saying it. Because in a country with such inflation, economic crisis and levels of poverty, it should cause outrage that it is proven that the former president caused billions of damage in acts of corruption. The issue is justice, but Kirchnerism prefers to have it on the street. Total, there it is to the blows.
And in the adulteration of reality, creating post-truth, there are known signs that are frequently used, especially by the allies of the Puebla Group. Does it look familiar?
